The article develops the proposition that interactions among people, tasks, and tools are least likely to fit the new context and hence are the most difficult to transfer. The article builds on a framework of knowledge reservoirs to show why knowledge transfer can be difficult and to identify the kinds of knowledge that are most difficult to transfer to different contexts. This concluding article in the special issue of Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes on the foundations of knowledge transfer in organizations argues that the creation and transfer of knowledge are a basis for competitive advantage in firms. The article builds on a framework of knowledge reservoirs to show why. read more read lessĪbstract: This concluding article in the special issue of Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes on the foundations of knowledge transfer in organizations argues that the creation and transfer of knowledge are a basis for competitive advantage in firms. The limited available evidence concerning this question shows that the theory is predicting behavior quite well in comparison to the ceiling imposed by behavioral reliability. Finally, inclusion of past behavior in the prediction equation is shown to provide a means of testing the theory*s sufficiency, another issue that remains unresolved. Optimal rescaling of expectancy and value measures is offered as a means of dealing with measurement limitations. Expectancy- value formulations are found to be only partly successful in dealing with these relations. Attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control are shown to be related to appropriate sets of salient behavioral, normative, and control beliefs about the behavior, but the exact nature of these relations is still uncertain. Intentions to perform behaviors of different kinds can be predicted with high accuracy from attitudes toward the behavior, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control and these intentions, together with perceptions of behavioral control, account for considerable variance in actual behavior. In broad terms, the theory is found to be well supported by empirical evidence. Research dealing with various aspects of* the theory of planned behavior (Ajzen, 1985, 1987) is reviewed, and some unresolved issues are discussed. Intentions to perform behaviors of different kinds can be predicted with high accuracy from attitud. To place your order, please contact the relevant regional sales office from the linkĪbstract: Research dealing with various aspects of* the theory of planned behavior (Ajzen, 1985, 1987) is reviewed, and some unresolved issues are discussed. These groups may be obtained from their web sites. International Association of Applied Psychology (IAAP) Organizational Behavior Division of the Academy of Management (AOM) Įuropean Association for Decision Making (EADM) Society for Judgment and Decision Making (SJDM) ![]() Special personal subscription rates of 91 USD forĢ008 are available for members of the:American Psychological Association (APA) Relevant to human attitudes, cognitions, and behavior in organizations. ![]() We are interested in articles that investigate these topics as they pertain to individuals, dyads, groups, and other social collectives.įor each topic, we place a premium on articles that make fundamental and substantial contributions to understanding psychological processes TopicsĬovered by the journal include perception, cognition, judgment, attitudes, emotion, well-being, motivation, choice, and performance. Theory development, literature reviews, and methodological advancements relevant to the substantive domains served by the journal. The journal features articles that present original empirical research, Psychology, and human cognition, judgment, and decision-making. ![]() ![]() Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes publishes fundamental research in organizational behavior, organizational
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |